Weekend Reading

Some links to stories and posts I’ve found interesting:

Later: Check out Mike Musgrove’s Washington Post article on his first few days in Facebook, too.
TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , ,

Will Blogs Make Vanity Publishers RIP?

blogs vanity publishers
Vanity publishers trade on, well, the vanity of people who feel they have a book within them that just needs to be published, no matter whether a regular publishing house thinks the book would be profitable or not.

I wonder whether vanity publishers are having a harder time these days, now that anyone can publish his or thoughts to the world for free through a blog.

After all, why would someone pay a publisher several thousand dollars to print a few cases of books (which then would need to be distributed and sold), when a blog provides instant worldwide access, with free distribution?

I think this might be another way in which the internet, and particularly Web 2.0, is disrupting the publishing industry. We know what it’s doing to traditional media, such as newspapers like the Minneapolis Star Tribune and Chicago Tribune, and broadcast networks like NBC. The Star Tribune lost 56 percent of its market value in barely 8 years, for instance.

Are those selling the dream of book publication to aspiring authors having a more difficult time these days, too? Are blogs enough of an outlet, so writers don’t feel the need to be published? Or does the experience of writing on a blog whet writers’ appetites to take the next step and paying to have their prose printed and bound? And how does this relate to the trend of authors giving away their books for free on the internet, either in PDF format or as audio files? Have you seen any information on what is happening to vanity press sales?
TechnoratiTechnorati: , , ,

Free Copywriting Seminar from a Crook

I have a debt to pay, so I need to tell you about a free copywriting seminar.

I wrote in an earlier post about some free book offers, (PDFs and audio files), and how that is a growing trend. I’ll have more reflections on that trend in a related post soon, but first I need to share another of those offers.

I saw another example yesterday on Lee Hopkins’ Better Communication Results blog, via his link from Walter Jennings’ blogroll. I had heard Lee (gotta like the name) previously on the For Immediate Release podcast, where he’s a regular contributor. Walter and I met (sort of) at the Page Society conference in California last week (we actually met via our blogs and Facebook afterwards.)

Free Seminar copywriting
The other Lee had an interesting post about a 10-hour copywriting seminar Trevor Crook formerly offered at $197, but which he is now giving away for free from his web site. I did it and started listening, and as Mr. Hopkins puts it, “Blimey, they’re good!”

All Trevor asks is that you pass the offer along to at least three friends (Oh, and you have to give him your email address, too.) Here’s the suggested text for an email to my friends that he sent with the download link:

What if I did you a favor, something big, something powerful and
proven to help you grow your business which you would usually have
to pay for and instead of paying for it, you simply pay it forward
to 3 more people as full ‘payment’.

You may think there’s a catch.

No, there isn’t. World class copywriter, Trevor Crook gave me his
10 hours of Copywriting Blueprint audios, his proven blueprint for
creating compelling sales copy and letters which he usually sells
for $197.

Trevor gave it to me as a favor because he has started a
revolution to help one million entrepreneurs in the next 30 days
and you and get a brilliant gift to help you get more sales plus
you can help change history at the same time.

You do not have to buy anything. There’s no gimmicks.

Too may people want to ‘take’ in today’s world instead of giving
and this is a recipe for a complete disaster.

When you understand the ‘Laws of Reciprocation’ like I do, you will
understand how much your life will change when you give freely
of yourself without any thoughts of getting anything back in return.

The sound quality on these isn’t great, but the content is really good. In the first session, for example, he focuses on the most important priority for successful sales copywriting, which is honing the offer: developing a compelling value proposition for your potential customers.

He’s putting that tip into practice, offering this seminar at an unbeatable price. Obviously, he’s betting that people who have heard his seminars will want to either engage him as a speaker, consultant or copywriter, or will want to buy some of his other products later.

So, instead of sending this in an email to a few targeted friends, I’m doing like Lee H and linking to it from my blog. I’m also posting it on my Facebook profile.

You may be asking, “Why would I want a teleseminar from a direct mail copywriter?” But that’s just like the problem I’ve been describing with how too many people see social media tools; they fail to think creatively about how Facebook or Twitter or MySpace can help them achieve business goals.

Even if you’re not in the direct marketing business, you’re probably selling your ideas in some way. Take the lessons you learn from Mr. Crook (admittedly not exactly the best name for someone in the mail order sales biz) and see how you can apply the concepts to your situation.

I’m going to continue listening, and hopefully Trevor’s tips will make my blog posts more compelling, too.

You’ll have to let me know whether it’s working, but remember: I’m only on the third lesson.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , ,

What’s your answer?

I think Daniel is right when he tells his fellow REALTORS that the fate of their business ten years (or less) from now depends on their answer to this question:

Are You on Facebook?

Click the link above to read his whole post, which is quite thoughtful. Also, check out his take on how internet marketing is going to change the real estate industry.

Daniel’s posts indicate that he’s thinking about this in the right way: instead of bemoaning how technology is undermining your current business model, it’s much more productive to look for ways to use those technologies to add value for your customers.

By abandoning its TimesSelect pay model for a portion of its content, the New York Times showed that it is understanding this reality.

In the customary SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis, it’s easy to fall into focusing on the T’s. But if you don’t take advantage of the O’s, that itself will be a long-term T for your business, because your competitors will find the opportunities presented by social media tools.

Given what so many businesses spend on advertising, why would you not take advantage of the free stuff?

Granted, it takes your time for interaction and engagement with your customers and prospects, but isn’t that what you do right now by phone and in person?

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , ,

AGs Chasing Facebook Headlines?

Facebook

The nation’s attorneys general, led by New York’s Andrew Cuomo, seem to be pulling a page out of the Peninsula PR piggybacking playbook by launching official investigations, complete with subpoenas, into whether Facebook, “is misleading users by promoting itself as a place where high school students and younger children are safe from adult sexual predators.”

This looks like an attempt to capitalize politically on a hot technology trend, because any story about Facebook is going to get lots of attention. Add in sexual predation, and you’ve got hundreds of Google news headlines.

The so-called scandal is pretty flimsy so far. But I guess that’s what the subpoenas are for. Sort of gives a whole new meaning to “bully” pulpit, doesn’t it?

The Los Angeles Times‘ story says…

To conduct its sting, Cuomo’s office set up several Facebook accounts, posing as 12- to 14-year-old users. Within days, the fake users had received several sexual solicitations from adults. Cuomo says the company ignored complaints about the inappropriate contact.

“Several” sting accounts, and “several” sexual solicitations. No details as to how many accounts or how many solicitations. So they may have set up 100 accounts and gotten three dirty messages. The New York Times at least reported that Cuomo’s office had refused to give any specific numbers.

Prosecutors would not release details about when the sting operation began or how many profiles it set up, and they would not share links to the fake profiles because the investigation is continuing, said Jeffrey Lerner, the director of communications for the attorney general’s office.

So this is a case of, “take our word for it, it was several.” And just in case you’re suspicious, they trump your questions with the killer anecdote:

But about a week after an investigator from Mr. Cuomo’s office set up a profile for a fictitious 14-year-old girl on Aug. 30, a 24-year-old man sent a message through Facebook asking her for “nude pics,” Mr. Cuomo said.

Two issues here:

First, did the New York AG pursue prosecution of the 24-year-old? When NBC does its “To Catch a Predator” series, luring pedophiles to meet with their supposedly underage prey, at least the bad guys get arrested. What kind of sting operation doesn’t go after the creeps, but instead after the medium that carries their messages?

Second, what kind of girls would send “nude pics” of themselves to strangers?

I have three daughters in Facebook, and tonight I asked one of them whether she had ever gotten a message asking her to send nude pictures to someone. Here’s where the conversation went from there:

R: “No, Dad.”

Me: “Well, if you ever do get a message like that, don’t send any pictures, OK?”

R: “OK, Dad.”

Whew! That was close! What if she would have gotten a message from Mr. Cuomo’s 24-year-old before I had talked with her?

As the New York Times further elaborates:

In a separate case, an investigator from Mr. Cuomo’s office set up profiles for a 13-year-old girl and for an adult who wrote to the teen, saying, “You’ve got quite a hot little bod.” The investigator, posing as the girl’s mother, forwarded the offensive message to Facebook and demanded that the company take immediate action. There was no response, Mr. Cuomo said.

No wonder Facebook is growing by 200,000 users a day! In that one operation the New York AG’s office set up three accounts: one for the fake teen, one for the fake pedophile and one for the fake mom. And maybe that’s where Peninsula got its figures about workers wasting time in Facebook. Was it a study of Mr. Cuomo’s office?

In contrast to these fakers, in my family we have “several” (six) real Facebook members: my wife, one son, three daughters and me. We have found that Facebook’s privacy settings are quite strong and flexible. No one sees your profile information without your permission, and there are all sorts of reminders throughout the site about how to modify privacy settings. My oldest daughter even met her husband in Facebook.

Sexually explicit spam has been non-existent for me in Facebook, in contrast to MySpace, where I’ve had “several” (12) friend invitations in the last month accompanied by links to sites with “nude pics.” My son got rid of his MySpace account for exactly that reason; I’m just keeping mine to make a point about the difference between Facebook and MySpace, and until I fill out my Alla to Zada roster of invitations.

Also, because in Facebook you need to go through a laborious Captcha process to prove you’re human and not a spam-bot when you’re sending messages, until you verify your account via text message to your cell phone, it’s much less prone to general spam.

Now, if we can just get our top state law enforcement officials to stop spamming through Facebook….

Still, even though it’s a challenge with more than 200,000 new accounts a day, Facebook does need to do better in responding to parent complaints like this, even the fictitious ones. The Wall Street Journal said this week that Microsoft wants a 5 percent stake in Facebook and may pay $500 million for it, which would make the company worth $10 billion. Facebook can afford to hire some more people to respond more quickly to parent complaints.

Facebook needs to do this not primarily to mollify the AGs, but instead to be vigilant about protecting its brand and ensuring that the reality of the safety and strong privacy options tens of millions of its users have experienced continues. That’s why Facebook has been growing so rapidly, and why valuations of six times YouTube and double the Wall Street Journal are being tossed around.

Of course Facebook needs to take these investigations seriously; just ask Microsoft what happens when attorneys general band against you. But based on my family’s experience, and as validated by TIME, for instance, I believe Facebook will come through this relatively unblemished.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , , , ,