GTD: Taking the Plunge

David Allen begins Getting Things Done (GTD) with a bold promise:

It’s possible for a person to have an overwhelming number of things to do and still function productively with a clear head and a positive sense of relaxed control. That’s a great way to live and work, at elevated levels of effectiveness and efficiency. It’s also becoming a critical operational style required of successful and high-performing professionals. You already know how to do everything necessary to achieve this high-performance state. If you’re like most people, however, you need to apply these skills in a more timely, complete and systematic way so you can get on top of it all instead of feeling buried.

In the remaining pages, David fulfills his promise by laying out a systematic approach that he has developed and refined over about two decades of organizational coaching. And unlike many other books on organization that introduce readers to broad concepts and principles, David offers concrete, step-by-step instructions on ways of organizing that he has repeatedly found effective in hundreds if not thousands of real-world situations.

That’s the essence of coaching: it’s not “introduce the concept, let the students figure out the details for themselves.” A good basketball coach, for example, teaches sound shooting technique by instructing players on effective form. It’s possible to be a good shooter with bad form, but it’s a lot less likely and takes a lot more work. Likewise, it’s possible to be effective at organizing your life and work by developing your own system from scratch. But if someone has taken the time to distill decades of experience into one book that has not only strategies for success, but also the nitty gritty tactics, why go out of your way to invent your own methods?

David Allen is the John Wooden of personal organization trainers. And just as Bill Walton and Lewis Alcindor (later Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) bought into Coach Wooden’s system to win 10 NCAA basketball titles (including seven in a row) for UCLA, you would do well, no matter your natural personal organization talents, to apply David Allen’s system to your life.

When I arrived home after my plane ride, I decided to just take David’s advice. He suggested getting an electronic label maker so filing would be fun and easy, so I did it. He made other office-supply suggestions for maximum efficiency, so I spent about $100 (including the label maker) to get what he said would be useful. He said it would be good to clear a couple of days to do an initial organization and to clear out the underbrush, so instead of taking the day after Thanksgiving off as I had previously planned, I used it dive in.

In the next few days I’ll be writing more about that experience, what I learned then, what I’ve learned in the year since then and how much more I’ve yet to really learn.

If you’re like many people, you’re probably coming into a weekend that will give you some free time. I think one of the best things you could do to get more out of your coming work week, and work weeks yet to come, would be to get a copy of GTD and read it straight through, and then resolve to apply what you learn. Or, as David says, to apply in a more systematic way what you already know, but perhaps haven’t taken time to consciously consider.

And while you’re at it, pick up one of Coach Wooden’s books, too. I especially recommend Wooden on Leadership.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , ,

GTD: A Year Later

It was on a trip to Jacksonville last November that I first read about GTD, David Allen’s Getting Things Done, in some blogs about personal productivity: one from Michael Hyatt, which led me to Marc’s Outlook on Productivity, which led to a presentation by Jeremy Wright, which I listened to and while following along with the Powerpoint.

After watching a presentation that seemed to make sense, and hearing everyone in these blogs (including Merlin Mann) talking about how fantastic GTD is, I decided that instead of reading articles from people who were applying David Allen’s system, it would be smart to get it straight from the source, and read his book. So I stopped by the book store on the way to the airport, and bought Getting Things Done for the plane ride home.

I was hooked.

GTD was one of the best purchases I’ve made. The system absolutely made sense, and what I loved most about it was how down-to-earth and practical it was. Books about strategic thinking can be both inspiring and deflating: they create aspirations for operating at a higher level, but don’t teach you how to clear the underbrush that creates all of the fires you constantly seem to be fighting. So as a result you develop the appetite for living more intentionally, but get either frustrated or guilty because the day-to-day press of “stuff” weighs you down.

GTD isn’t like that; it gives you immensely practical tools for dealing with the crush of “stuff” that is a reality in our always-on information society, so you can make time to do the strategic part.

Over the next couple of weeks, as I approach my one-year anniversary with GTD, I’m going to share some highlights of the practical benefits I’ve derived, the areas in which the immediate benefits have been tremendous, and some areas in which I still need work. I wrote about (and showed) some of the benefits in this post. I plan to elaborate on what has worked well (and also hopefully re-establish some habits that have become less habitual.)

I hope people reading this will find the example helpful, and that maybe you also would share your experiences, either through comments or trackbacks. I’d love to hear practical tips and pointers you can offer.

But more importantly, I hope you will do what I did: read the book for yourself instead of getting it second-hand.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , ,

Strategic Health Care Podcasting Audioconference

During the noon hour today we listened to an audioconference presentation sponsored by Strategic Health Care Communications, which outlined several ways health care organizations are using video and audio podcasting to communicate with employees, patients and potential patients, or for continuing medical education classes.

One interesting point I heard from the Arizona cardiology group was that they found video was about nine times more popular than audio, based on a year of podcast delivery.

It was good to hear some practical experiences from some other groups using podcasting, and I also thought the idea of hosting podcasts within a blog made sense, to make the segments easier for search engines to find.

The listing of online podcast directories and search engines also was helpful. In addition to using a blog, it would be good to get podcasts listed on iTunes, Yahoo! Podcasts, Podcast.net, Podcast Alley, Pod Feeder, Podcasting News, Podnova, All Podcasts, Loomia, iPodder.org, Odeo, Podcast Directory, Digital Podcast, Podcast Bunker, Pod Feed, Podcast Pickle, Pod Tower, and Podscope.

A CD of this audioconference is available on the web, and for my fellow Mayo Clinic listeners, let me know if you want a copy of the presentation materials.

I would welcome any thoughts from others who attended this audioconference, in terms of what would be most applicable and actionable.

TechnoratiTechnorati: ,

Sagging Sundays Lead Dailies’ Drop

Editor and Publisher has the latest six-month circulation figures for newspapers, and the news isn’t good.

The Los Angeles Times reported that daily circulation fell 8% to 775,766. Sunday dropped 6% to 1,172,005.

The San Francisco Chronicle was down. Daily dropped 5.3% to 373,805 and Sunday fell 7.3% to 432,957.

The New York Times lost 3.5% daily to 1,086,798 and 3.5% on Sunday to 1,623,697. Its sister publication, The Boston Globe, reported decreases in daily circulation, down 6.7% to 386,415 and Sunday, down 9.9% to 587,292.

The Washington Post lost daily circulation, which was down 3.3% to 656,297 while Sunday declined 3.6% to 930,619.

Circulation losses at The Wall Street Journal were average, with daily down 1.9% to 2,043,235. The paper’s Weekend Edition, however, saw its circulation fall 6.7% to 1,945,830.

Daily circulation at USA Today slipped 1.3% to 2,269,509.

As the article points out, the latest report seems to indicate that the circulation decline is accelerating:

This is the fourth consecutive semi-annual report to register a severe drop in daily circulation and — perhaps more troubling to the industry — Sunday copies. While the estimated decline 2.8% for daily circulation for all reporting papers may seem negligible, consider that in years past that decrease averaged around 1%. Sunday, considered the industry’s bread-and-butter, showed even steeper losses, with a decline of about 3.4%.

In fact, of the top 25 U.S. dailies, only the New York Post, New York Daily News and St. Louis Post-Dispatch showed any gain. The table is here.

Some Perspective: Newspapers are clearly facing a tough climate, as the recent budget problems and staff cuts at the Los Angeles Times testify. Obviously these circulation declines can’t continue forever if these papers are to remain economically viable; and maybe the “paper” part of daily newspaper will need to become less important.

But newspapers are still among the places where it is possible to make the biggest splash about an issue and reach a broad audience. When a web-based story or viral video reaches a million people, that’s a huge and extraordinary hit. The LA Times reaches (with pass-alongs) that many people with its top stories every day.

That’s why getting a story about the DM&E in the Times this week was a huge lift in drawing attention to this record $2.3 billion federal bailout (bigger than Chrysler), to help turn up the heat on the issue.

(Disclosure: I work for Mayo Clinic, one of the members of the coalition attempting to kill this $2.3 billion federal loan to DM&E. For more information about this issue, click here.)

New media, like the web site maintained by the “Track the Truth” campaign, make it possible for people and organizations other than the traditional news media to reach a broad audience directly. But even though the audiences for traditional media are declining, big dailies, local metro TV news and national broadcast and cable networks are still the best ways to reach a big audience.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , ,

Pew Releases Report on Health Web Search

The Pew Internet & American Life project has just released a new survey (download the PDF here) examining the behavior of the American public when it comes to on-line search for health information.

The Headline:

Most internet users start at a search engine when looking for health information online.
Very few check the source and date of the information they find.

About 10 million people search for health information each day, but only 15 percent check the validity of sources they find. The Pew pollsters hypothesize that it is because about 10 times as many people say they have had positive health results from their on-line information quests as compared to those who say they got bum info.

For people looking for trustworthy health information, I would suggest (in addition to the official government sites like NIH and CDC) MayoClinic.com for general health information or mayoclinic.org for information about specific treatments at Mayo Clinic. I know the people who work on both sites, and I know the editing and double-checking processes ensure that the information will be reliable. If you don’t check the sources, they have.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , ,