Why Every Business Should Use Facebook

As I previously mentioned, I had an opportunity a couple of weeks ago to distill my thoughts on the business benefits of Facebook for an article Julie Sartain was writing for Computerworld. It was a really useful exercise for me, and an opportunity to encapsulate what I’ve learned in the 10 months or so since I first wrote about Facebook Business Uses.

You can find many of these thoughts expressed, described and demonstrated in more detail in posts linked to SMUG’s Facebook Business page, in its Facebook category or in the formal Facebook curriculum, but I’m posting my full essay here.

===

From telephones on each salesperson’s desk to fax machines in every work unit to the hundreds of millions of workplace personal computers connected to the Internet, U.S. business leaders have invested incalculable billions of dollars over the last several decades to connect their employees with the outside world and with each other.

They’ve justified these investments because of increased productivity and greater organizational agility. In 1990, for example, being able to receive customer purchase orders by fax instead of via FedEx or local courier was a huge advance, well worth several hundred dollars for the device purchase and the monthly charges for the requisite extra phone line.

And if AT&T had offered its business customers a free fax machine and dedicated phone line, can you imagine anyone declining?

Social networking sites like Facebook are a much more profound communications phenomenon than the fax, and Facebook’s functionality far surpasses the transmission of black-and-white document images. Yet not only are many businesses failing to take advantage of the free communication services Facebook provides: some actively block their employees from accessing it from their workstations.

What’s wrong with this facsimile? Can you even conceive that business owners and managers would not only reject the mythical free fax offering, but would call security to have the AT&T representative escorted from the premises?

Many managers misperceive Facebook, and therefore fail to appreciate its benefits. I’ve listed some practical Facebook business uses below. While every category won’t apply to every business, if you can’t find some way to profitably leverage a free communications network that has more than 70 million active members, your main business problem is likely lack of creative thinking and vision.

Here are five free Facebook business uses you should consider, plus a low-cost bonus:

Directory Listing: You can establish a free “fan” page for your business or organization in Facebook, complete with links to your Web site, photos, videos and contact information to key employees or salespeople. It’s like a supercharged multimedia white pages listing in a telephone directory. Here’s the Mayo Clinic Facebook fan page.

Word-of-Mouth Catalyst: When people become a “fan” of your organization, or when they write on your wall, it shows up on their Facebook profile and in their friends’ news feeds.

Collaboration Networks: Facebook allows you to form an unlimited number of free groups. They can be open to anyone, closed (you must invite or approve new members) or even secret (their existence doesn’t show up on your profile.) The latter two types could enable your employees to collaborate with each other and with external vendors or agencies, without providing them VPN access behind your corporate firewall.

Free Intranet: Speaking of corporate firewalls, if you run a small business, Facebook could be your intranet, through a secret or closed group. You can post important updates from leadership, invite discussion and even use Facebook Chat for instant messaging, without any expense or IT support. Each work team or unit within your company could have its own secret Facebook group for collaboration.

What about data security? Let’s face it: you probably have a hard enough time getting your employees to pay attention to your corporate priorities. Do you really think it’s likely your competitors will A) Find out that you have a secret Facebook group, B) Have the technical sophistication to engage in strategic espionage, and C) Effectively share the information from your secret group with their employees to put you at a significant competitive disadvantage?

Don’t use Facebook to store your bank account or credit card numbers or other information that could have serious legal ramifications if released, but understand this: most of your corporate information just isn’t all that interesting.

Focus Groups: Groups also let you invite current or potential customers or clients to interact with you and share feedback on your products and services. You can bring them together without travel expense or schedule coordination, and your group can be much larger than what can be managed behind the one-way mirror of a focus group.

The Non-Free Bonus: With 85 percent of college students having profiles, Facebook ads could be a great tool for employee recruitment. You can target pay-per-click ads to students at particular schools, with specific college majors and to undergrads or those who already have their degrees, with a link to a Facebook group or your recruiting site. The extra bonus is that by showing openness to social tools like Facebook that are part of how today’s students interact, you’re more likely to be perceived as a desirable place to work.

I’m not advocating diving into Facebook without first thinking exactly what you hope to accomplish, and whether Facebook is the right fit. But given its power (and the new privacy settings, demonstrated in Facebook 210, which enable separation of personal and professional networking), the burden of proof in the discussion should be on those who oppose its use.

===

What do you think? What other practical uses for Facebook have you found? I’d love to hear your stories. And if you disagree with anything I’ve said, I’d be glad to hear your reasons.

Skype Videoconference Tutoring

I first experimented with Skype when I stayed at a hotel in central Wisconsin in which there was no cell phone reception. It was a great way to avoid the obscene per-minute charges for the hotel’s phone service.

I haven’t really needed it since then. Until today, when I wanted to set up a videoconference for tomorrow. We have a videoconferencing unit at work, and when I called an external collaborator to get the IP address for her videoconferencing service, she replied, “We just always use Skype.”

While we were still on the phone, I downloaded Skype on my (relatively) new MacBook Pro and signed in using my previously established account. Within a minute or so I got a message telling me that videoconferencing was enabled using my built-in iSight camera. A few seconds later we were talking face-to-face.

My main point in writing this post is to call your attention to Skype if you haven’t used it previously. I expect to be using it all day tomorrow for a videoconference (which will be free, like everything else you see here.) And when my daughter and her husband move to California next year with our first grandchild (who’s due in September), I’m sure we’ll be videoconferencing regularly.

But meanwhile, if you’re a SMUG student and would like to have a “Chat with the Chancellor” for some videoconference tutoring, send me an e-mail (leeaase at gmail.com) and we can arrange virtual office hours.

The End of Cable TV as We Know It?

Cable TV
Cable TV companies resist a la carte offerings of channels because they want subscribers to buy tiers of service. If we could opt to receive only the dozen or so channels we regularly watch and not pay for others, that would be good for us as consumers, but not for the cable companies or the cable networks. They would rather have a smaller charge spread over the mass of subscribers instead of a higher charge for those who really want a particular channel.

So even if I don’t want my MTV, I still have to pay for it.

Interestingly, as the New York Times reports, the cable companies use the opposite logic to avoid adding the Big Ten network and other sports networks to their basic service or even extended basic. They want to add a separate sports tier that only the hard-core sports fans will get. They don’t want to pass along the dollar-per-subscriber the Big Ten network is demanding, for instance, to every subscriber’s cable bill.

The reality, though, is the cable companies don’t want to pay the $1/subscriber. If it was 25 cents per subscriber instead, they would signing all of us up for it.

But whether they like it or not, a la carte is coming. Joost, for example, has been heralded as providing a way for users to share super high-quality video, and as people see that they can get access to most of the video they want simply through their broadband internet, they will be increasingly likely to dump cable altogether and just get their video through the web. Instead of being limited to several dozen or even a few hundred channels, consumers will have literally unlimited choices for video viewing.

In the future, instead of buying internet service as an add-on for your cable TV service, you’ll just have high-speed internet, and cable as we know it today won’t matter much. It isn’t that cable TV companies will all go bankrupt, but their business model will have to change.

And it’s interesting that even Joost, which has such disruptive potential for cable TV, may itself be facing disruptive competition before it even gets out of beta. TechCruch had an interesting post Friday, entitled The Clock is Ticking for Joost. When Flash 9 becomes widely available, the quality of all web video will double, reducing the advantage Joost has today. And users won’t need a special software player to receive this quality: it will be available through an ordinary web browser.

This all will work really well for pre-recorded programs, but what about the cable news networks and live sports? I think what’s most likely is some people will subscribe to the news and sports networks they want (like mlb.com, nfl.com, nba.com) and get the video streamed over the web. They’ll get rid of their cable TV altogether, much as families like mine have abandoned their landlines for phone service.

This in turn will put pressure on the cable companies that the federal regulators haven’t. Faced with the reality that consumers do have choices of how to get their video (since they could use DSL or satellite dish to get their broadband), the cable companies will eventually open up to a la carte.

What do you think? How long will it be before the reality of broadband video access forces cable TV companies to allow subscribers to pick which channels and networks they want? If you have cable TV now, what’s the one channel or type of programming you can’t do without? What’s keeping you a cable subscriber?

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , ,

Looking Forward to the Page Panel

Arthur W. Page Society
On Tuesday, I’m part of a panel at the Arthur W. Page Society‘s annual conference in Dana Point, Calif. The subject is The Rise of Social Networking and Its Impact on Business.

Members of the panel are:

  • Lee Aase, Manager, National Media Relations, Research Communications and New Media, Mayo Clinic (That’s me!)
  • Jeff Berman, Senior Vice President for Public Affairs and General Manager of Video at MySpace.com
  • Adam Brown, Director, Digital Communications, The Coca-Cola Company
  • Jonathan Taplin (Moderator), Digital Media Consultant; Adjunct Professor, Annenberg School of Communication, USC

I always enjoy attending and presenting at conferences, because the interaction and sharing of ideas stimulates me to new applications in my work.

But I’m looking forward to this conference more than any I’ve previously attended. The subtitle of this blog is “Thoughts on New Media, News Media and Productivity,” and much of what I write is about changes in the media landscape and what they mean for PR professionals and the organizations we serve. This whole conference is arranged around that same theme (and other global business changes.) And I’m going to get to hear first hand from panelists and speakers including:

  • Tina Brown, Author/Editor
  • Beth Comstock, President, NBC Universal Integrated Media,
  • Mitch Gelman, Senior VP and Senior Executive Producer, CNN.com
  • Ed Leonard, Chief Technology Officer, Dreamworks Animation SKG
  • Phil Rosenthal, Media Columnist, Chicago Tribune

Those are just the media representatives. Many of the other presenters and most of the participants are Chief Communications Officers for Fortune 500 corporations or are leaders of global PR and consulting firms.

The theme of the conference is Manage for Tomorrow: Corporate Communications in a Changing World. I expect it will be highly stimulating. Check out the Page Society web site for more background on the organization and this event.

I’ll share what I can from the conference as it happens to the extent it is consistent with the organizers’ wishes, but whether I “live blog” or not, I know that what I learn will affect my perspective and my writing in the coming months.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , , , , ,

LA Times Facebook Story

LA Times Facebook story
The Los Angeles Times has a major story this morning on the Facebook platform for application development. Here’s an excerpt:

Software developers have built more than 3,000 programs to run on the social networking site in the last three months. The uses range from the practical, such as buying music or scouting vacation spots, to the quirky, including sending virtual gifts or biting your friends to turn them into zombies.

About 80% of Facebook’s 40 million users have added at least one feature to their profiles. The most successful applications claim millions of users.

“Facebook is God’s gift to developers,” said Lee Lorenzen, founder of Altura Ventures, a Monterey, Calif., investment firm that started betting exclusively on companies creating Facebook programs in July. “Never has the path from a good idea to millions of users been shorter.”

The Facebook free-for-all began in May, when the Palo Alto company invited hundreds of software developers to build their own features for the social-networking site and pocket the proceeds. The new strategy triggered a digital land rush, with 80,000 developers signing up.

They all wanted a shot at the desirably youthful demographic of Facebook users, many of whom spend hours a day on the site.

Now entrepreneurs looking to start companies or expand existing ones are building businesses on Facebook the way they used to build businesses on the Web, but they are doing it faster and cheaper — and with a built-in audience that provides instant feedback.

Read the entire article here.

I don’t know whether Facebook is really “God’s gift to developers,” but I did write yesterday about how it might be a gift for churches.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , ,