Melting Icebergs in the Northland

Pioneer Press

More evidence of continued economic difficulty for traditional media due to declining circulation and resulting loss of ad sales. This morning’s Minneapolis Star Tribune, reporting (registration required) on crosstown rival Pioneer Press, says the St. Paul paper has had a land rush for the buyouts offered to senior newsroom staffers.

Twenty-one senior members of the St. Paul Pioneer Press newsroom have been offered buyouts as part of the company’s decision to downsize in the wake of slumping ad sales, editor Thom Fladung said Thursday.
The number was higher than the 10 originally called for in the paper’s cost-cutting moves, because more staffers sought the buyouts, Fladung said.

“When you have a lot of veteran journalists come forward and they sincerely want [a buyout], then it’s incumbent on me to try really hard to give them that. I felt I owed them,” he said.

The 21 employees could rescind their buyout requests, but most are expected to be gone by today.

The Pioneer Press says the cutbacks amount to 30 in total, including the 21 newsroom staff. The newsroom will be reduced by 10 percent.

The people taking buyouts “have been peers, coaches and friends to us,” he said in an e-mail to the newsroom. Today is the last day at the paper for the people taking buyouts. The package amounts to two weeks worth of pay for every year of service at the paper, up to 52 weeks.

Early next week Fladung said he’ll pass on more information about how the buyouts will affect the workers who remain. The changes will put a higher premium on communication in the newsroom and identifying the best stories, he said.

“This was so fast,” said Don Effenberger, 57, an editor at the paper with 28 years of experience. Employees had about three weeks to decide whether to take the buyout. Effenberger says he’s not retiring, though, and will look for another job.

In his short book/fable, Our Iceberg is Melting, which I reviewed here, John Kotter says complacency is the number one barrier to businesses making necessary changes in a rapidly changing environment. That point, and Kotter’s other 8 steps to successful transformation, are examined in more detail in his Leading Change, written in 1996. I picked up a used copy on Amazon and am reading it now. It is helpful background to his more recent book about the nomadic penguins, and I recommend it as well.

It seems the Pioneer Press (and senior newsroom staffers) are well beyond complacency. And earlier this week, Ford announced that 38,000 hourly employees had accepted buyouts, and in October NBC announced 700 job cuts. It seems a sense of urgency to find new ways of providing value to consumers, combined with reasonable means of getting paid for it, would behoove us all. As I’ve said before, whatever you think of the climatological phenomenon of global warning, from an economic perspective it’s here already. Icebergs are melting everywhere.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , , , , ,

A Note to Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine

I tried to leave a comment on this excellent post from Jeff Jarvis on Buzz Machine. For some reason I got an error message the first time I posted, and then got a duplicate comment warning when I tried again.

Jeff had taken issue with Brian Williams’ approach to interactivity on the NBC Nightly News broadcast. Here’ my comment for Jeff:

I agree completely with your comments. I’m glad NBC is offering its content as a podcast (at least placing its wares in a place that’s more convenient for me, so I can watch on the bus in the morning), but when I saw this mailbag segment Friday I, too, struggled with dyspepsia.

Reading kudos from viewers, utopian “We are the World” suggestions and one lame complaint about choice of tie color and pattern isn’t media glasnost.

At least Bill O’Reilly, whatever you think of him, usually reads a sampling of hate mail and plaudits, to show that “if everyone is mad at you, you must be doing something right.” That’s not great either, but at least it’s a step above this.

Have you checked out Brian Williams’ blog? I haven’t yet (will probably head over there now), but I wonder if that’s interactive to the point that it lets people leave comments.

If it is, maybe you could post a link to your post on his blog.

The big networks aren’t going to turn the keys over to what still is an audience of 8-9 million for their over-the-air program that still commands tens of thousands of dollars per second for ad revenue.

I know you’re saying it formerly was an audience and it used to be content, but if there is going to be real interactivity it’s going to come in a related blog, not in the broadcast.

So maybe I overstated a bit when I started by saying “I agree completely.” I do agree this kind of “pick a few notes from the mailbag” is a waste, but I don’t think we’ll see what you’re advocating in the broadcast program.

The good news is people like us have ways of talking back (as you did). Five years ago we wouldn’t have had a chance.

Are you going to post this on YouTube? I’m wondering why you use embedded QuickTime instead of YouTube. It would seem the BuzzMachine could get even more buzz if people could include your video in their blogs.

This comment has gotten a lot longer than I had intended…so I’m going to post on my blog, too. 😉

Thanks for all you do.

Maybe this will work in Jeff’s blog as a trackback.

Meanwhile, Jeff, if you’re seeing this, I did just go over to Brian Williams’ blog, and he does have a place for comments. Maybe you could leave a comment there with a link to your post.

I don’t know whether it will get past comment moderation. They post this disclaimer:

All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to this post, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

It’s worth a shot, don’t you think? I can see that they would have heartburn about putting criticism of their program on their high-priced broadcast platform, but if they are interested at all in any kind of real conversation, it would seem a comment from you, and a link to what you said on your blog, would be a minimum level of engagement.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , ,

Dr. Max Gomez out at WNBC?

Broadcasting & Cable reported this week that Dr. Max Gomez, the Health and Science reporter for NBC’s flagship station in New York, will be among those losing jobs as part of the network’s cost-cutting.

If this is true, it is perhaps the ultimate expression of a trend we’ve seen in local TV news for some time. Many TV stations formerly had physician journalists who would provide news and medically informed commentary, while others would have reporters regularly assigned to the health care beat. The Association of Health Care Journalists and others (PDF of journal article) have produced reports highlighting concerns about medical news coverage on local TV stations. One of those concerns is that many if not most stations treat medical news as a general assignment beat, which doesn’t allow reporters to develop the savvy and expertise they need to cover this highly technical subject matter.

The trend is toward the networks producing more health and medical news and features, and feeding it to the local affiliates. That’s been happening for a long time, but when a major network station in the biggest market no longer has a physician reporter, apparently for budgetary reasons, how many stations can or will continue to afford a regular on-air physician?

From my reading of Jeff Jarvis, I’m pretty sure he would say this is a good thing…or at least it is a reality TV stations should embrace. He’s big on local stations and newspapers getting more local in their news focus in terms of what their reporters (aided by the community) produce, and leave a few bigger organizations (networks and wire services) to do the truly national stories. He sees it as vanity, for instance, that compels local media to send reporters to the Super Bowl or to national political conventions. There really isn’t a local angle to these national events, at least one that needs to be covered on site, but the local media feel more important by having a correspondent there.

I think Jeff would say, for example, that this week’s FDA approval of Herceptin for a type of early-stage breast cancer is a national story that can be very well covered by the networks and the wires, and that for the most part local outlets should mainly be conduits.

What do you think?

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , ,

NBC Nightly News Tops iTunes Podcast List

Apparently I’m not alone in my high opinion of the NBC Nightly News podcast. It’s number one on the iTunes Store’s list of most-subscribed podcasts. I think that means it has the most subscriptions in the last 24 hours.

When you think of it, if programs are good enough to have high ratings on broadcast TV, they should be really strong in the download market too. Given that lots of people are paying for TV programs like Lost, getting broadcast-quality content for free should be even more appealing.

TechnoratiTechnorati: , ,

Radio Upheaval

As had been rumored, Clear Channel — the largest ownership group in radio, with more than 1,500 stations — has been sold. The purchase price: $26.7 billion. As Radio & Records reports, the result will be 448 radio stations put on the market:

Veteran broker Frank Boyle tells R&R he expects the pricing on this sale to be a lot like what CBS pushed through when it put its stations out for bid last summer. In Boyle talk: “Steep.” “I think there will be some steep pricing and I think they will drive a hard bargain,” Boyle says. He also expect that Goldman, Sachs & Co. will ride herd on the sale and that “for brokers like myself, we’ll not be on the first two or three tiers, it’ll be the Wall Street guys [who get first pick at the inventory]. Then it’ll get down to 10 or 15 guys like me who have an inventory of ready buyers.”

Still, there is great cause for excitement with so much new inventory becoming available, figures Dick Blackburn, whose Blackburn & Co. is based in Alexandria, Va. “There will be a market like there hasn’t been for quite a while since we’ve had a pretty small inventory for so long,” Blackburn says. “Now there will be some really attractive assets on the market and there will be a lot of interest in it.”

Clear Channel, the nation’s largest radio group with more than1,500 outlets coast-to-coast, could spawn the beginning of a new ownership era for many individuals and groups, Blackburn and Boyle tell R&R. Boyle says that with so many stations being available for purchase at once, the “emergency of four-to six new groups that would use this as seed groups” is possible. Blackburn acknowledged that, while remote, there is always the chance that a company might come “out of nowhere with zero stations and [buy] 100 or 200 stations.”

Clear Channel was more than the proverbial 800-pound gorilla in the radio business. Taking itself private, and if the new owners of the stations it sells do in fact pay a steep price and finance the purchase with debt, means the certainty of more uncertainty throughout the radio industry. It’s a reversal of consolidation, as at least the biggest player is breaking up, but if the audiences are getting smaller and the price for station purchasing stays high, it still may impose some harsh economics on the day-to-day station operations.

Jeff Jarvis and others have suggested that for “old” media to stay relevant, they need to, among other things, get “hyperlocal.” That goes against the Clear Channel model of buying up large numbers of stations, putting them on the same basic format, and automating as much as possible to cut costs. If debt leads to more automation and homogeneity, this will continue the decline of radio. But if getting stations in different hands leads some owners to experiment more with returning the local voice to radio, it may be the start of something good.

TechnoratiTechnorati: ,