In many of my presentations this year I have used the video embedded immediately below to illustrate the quality available through consumer-grade video cameras, such as the Flip video camera. With my daughter Rachel’s permission, here’s an example of what you get from the Flip UltraHD, from my granddaughter Evelyn’s first birthday party in August:
Here is an example of a video I shot earlier in April with the standard definition version of the Flip video camera (before we got HD), with Philadelphia Phillies outfielder Jayson Werth, in a room behind the dugout at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia:
You will note that in this video there is background noise from the indoor pitching machine and batting cage, but I think in both cases the quality of the video is perfectly acceptable for use on the Web. And since the HD only costs $50 more, I think it’s well worth the extra cost. (Of course, I’m kind of partial to the subject of that HD video .)
Kodak has some similar consumer-grade video cameras, such as the Kodak Zi8 HD, and their key advantage is that they have an external microphone jack, which could improve the audio quality in some cases. If I had used that camera for the interview with Jayson Werth, for instance, the batting cage noise probably would have been less pronounced. The good news: you can put in a huge memory card to get really long recording times without having to download the files to your computer. The bad news: extra cost.
Here’s an example of a video we shot with the external microphone, and uploaded to YouTube:
One additional advantage of the Kodak is it can record in 1080p, but can also downshift to 720p or even standard definition. Here’s a brief sound bite to that effect from my colleague Joel Streed, shot and edited as 1080p.
The downside of 1080p is that for a video of any length, the processing power required is pretty immense, without much of a perceptible difference in image quality, at least for Web video.
If you don’t see yourself complicating the recording process by attaching a remote microphone to the interview subject, the Flip video camera is fine.
So, to sum up, here are the advantages I see for each of these cameras (as compared with each other):
Flip UltraHD Camcorder, 120 Minutes (Black)(Amazon Affiliate link – currently $149.99)
- Simplicity and cost. One-button operation and a ready-to-go camera. With the Kodak, by contrast, you really can’t shoot video unless you have purchased an SD memory card. And if you’re going to take advantage of the external microphone, that means you need to buy an external microphone. So the Flip video camera price is pretty much “all inclusive” while you will have some additional costs for the Kodak. Given the $70 difference on Amazon you see here currently between the Flip and the Kodak, you’ll likely spend at least $100 more for the Kodak.
- Solid, durable design (the Kodak’s USB connector seems a bit more flimsy)
- Can use AA batteries. (With the Kodak, you could possibly be stuck with a temporarily unusable camera if the built-in rechargeable batteries run down. On the Flip Ultra HD, if you’re in that situation you can swap out the rechargeable pack and replace it temporarily with AAs.)
Kodak Zi8 HD Pocket Video Camera (Amazon affiliate link – Currently $219.99)
- External microphone jack. If you’re shooting in a noisy environment, this gives you the possibility of using a remote microphone to get better sound. With the Flip you need to choose where you shoot if the sound quality is important.
- Flexibility in storage. The Flip UltraHD holds two hours of video in its 8 GB memory. With the Kodak you can use a bigger card and record longer, although a larger card adds to the camera’s cost.
- Multiple resolution choices. You can record 1080p, 720p or standard definition. The Flip UltraHD is just straight 720p.
The really good news to take away from this is that there are at least a couple of good options for capturing video using consumer grade cameras for use in your professional efforts in social media, whether it’s posting videos to YouTube, Facebook or some other sharing site. Both of these cameras are light, small and therefore easy to carry in a coat pocket or purse, so you’ll never need to worry about missing an opportunity to capture video.
The first rule of video is that you can’t edit what you don’t shoot, so these cameras both make it more likely you’ll get some good material for editing.
6 thoughts on “Flip Video Camera vs. Kodak Video Camera”
@LeeAase I got a #Kodak #Zi8 for $144 via #Amazon – #CNET says better than #Flip http://bit.ly/bf3ga – #PCWorld http://bit.ly/4xwef2
So, which costs less to ship overnight if and when you leave it on a podium somewhere?
That’s a GREAT question, and reminds me of another post I have in the works. Gotta get on that. But offhand, as long as one doesn’t weigh 6 lbs., I think they should be equivalent. 😉
We had a fleet of Flips but bought a Zi8 because of sound. After using them quite a bit, I’d say we use the Flip when speed counts but the Zi8 if sound is important.
These cameras are incredibly portable and shoot great quality video, which makes them valuable social marketing tools. If you are going to do any handheld shooting, though, your video will be shaky — and no one wants to watch video that will make them seasick. I’ve designed an inexpensive, pocket-sized gadget that allows you to shoot steady video on the go. It’s called the readySTEADY — and I encourage you to check it out!