A Twitter Quote That Crushes It!

I’m listening to the audio version of Gary Vaynerchuk’s new book, Crush It!: Why NOW Is the Time to Cash In on Your Passion, and Gary just used one of the best, most direct lines about Twitter’s value I’ve heard recently:

If you’re not using Twitter because you’re in the camp that thinks it’s stupid, you’re going to lose. It’s as simple as that. It doesn’t matter if you think it’s stupid. It’s free communication, and there’s a crapload of users.

If you have sensibilities about salty language, this book may cause hypertension (figuratively speaking). He’s got some solid insights, though, backed by his experience of having applied social media profitably.

I’ll probably do a full review when I’m done, but couldn’t resist sharing this quote. So far, it seems like his book might be a good introductory text in “Why you should enroll in SMUG!”

Gary has some good examples of how social media (Twitter in particular) can help you build your personal or business brand. I think SMUG can give step-by-step help for people Gary has inspired to get into social media, but who need some how-to handholding.

Why I’m glad I’m not at SXSW

Watching some of the tweet stream, I’m sure I would have really enjoyed being in Texas for South by Southwest. But I’ve had a lot of fun this week watching basketball, including Wednesday night when my son Joe, a high school freshman, got his first game action with the varsity team in the first round of the Section 1AAA Minnesota High School Basketball Tournament. Here’s a snippet of his play:

Joe isn’t the guy who nailed the three in that sequence; that was Connor Gunderson, a senior who scored his 1,000th career point in the last regular season game.

Joe only has 998 to go.

Tonight the Austin Packers, seeded third, travel to second-seeded New Prague for the semifinal. I would definitely feel badly if I were missing it. I’ll have to rely on @EdBennett and others for the #SXSW and #SXSWi scoop.

Update: The Packers made a valiant run at it, but came up just short after falling behind by about 20. They cut it to 5 but couldn’t quite make it.

Where have all the polyps gone?

When I heard that Peter Yarrow of the ’60s trio (with Paul and Mary) had recorded The Colonoscopy Song to increase awareness of the need for colon cancer screening among those of his vintage, all sorts of lyrical possibilities ran through my mind…

Where have all the polyps gone?

Long time passing

Where have all the polyps gone?

Long time ago

Where have all the polyps gone?

Gone to lesions everyone!

When will we ever learn? When will we ever learn?

I naturally saw the progression moving from polyps to lesions to metastases (although that had too many syllables for the song’s meter) to graveyards. But instead of just recycling one of his oldies, Peter came up with a whole new song, which he performed on the CBS Early Show this week (and also posted to YouTube):

To support this screening awareness initiative, we interviewed a Mayo Clinic physician about for more background on colon cancer and colonoscopy.

I had my first colonoscopy about a year ago, a few years ahead of the time when I would otherwise qualify for a screening colonoscopy, as part of the journey that led to my diagnosis of celiac disease. The prep wasn’t the most fun, but I actually have no memory of the colonoscopy itself.

I don’t know whether my colon, like Peter’s, is “really cool.” But I’m glad to know it doesn’t have precancerous polyps. If you’re over 50 and haven’t had a colonoscopy, make an appointment this week to find out about the coolness of your colon.

Tweets on the Times: “Getting” Social Media, or Not?

While I generally don’t like the dismissive attitude embodied in the assertion that a person or organization doesn’t “get” something, a couple of recent tweets relating to the New York Times and social media make me at least ask the question.

As I was checking my Tweetdeck on the bus this morning, I noted this tweet from Jeremiah Owyang (@jowyang):

…which linked to this article about the NY Times hiring 12 techies and a social media whiz. That was encouraging to read, but as I scrolled down a bit through last night’s #Oscars tweets I came across this one from Jay Rosen (@jayrosen_NYU):

…which linked to this post about the reasons behind a plagiarism problem at the Times, and how the culture there and at the Wall Street Journal is antithetical to the world of social media. Felix Salmon’s (@felixsalmon) post (to which I have added emphasis) begins as follows:

Clark Hoyt, the NYT’s public editor, has a good post-mortem on l’affaire Zachary Kouwe, and asks whether “the culture of DealBook, the hyper-competitive news blog on which Kouwe worked” was partly to blame for his plagiarism.

It’s a good question, but also a dangerous one, because I fear it will help to keep blogs marginalized at the NYT and elsewhere: is there something inherent to the culture of blogging which breeds a degree of carelessness ill suited to a venerable newspaper?

The answer, in truth, is not that the NYT has gone too far down the bloggish rabbit hole, but rather that it hasn’t gone far enough. Kouwe was a reporter for the newspaper as well as for Dealbook, and as far as I know he has never had a blog of his own before or since. Big mainstream-media publications, when they hire people to write their blogs, generally hire people with no blogging experience at all — something which is both ill-conceived and dangerous. Some journalists make good bloggers; most don’t. So rather than gamble that you’ve found one of the rare exceptions, why not make prior blogging experience a prerequisite for such positions?

The fundamental problem with Kouwe was that when he saw good stories elsewhere, he felt the need to re-report them himself, rather than simply linking to what he had found, as any real blogger would do as a matter of course.

I hope the actions highlighted in Jeremiah’s tweet mean that the Times will begin to change its approach and will start linking externally. Bringing in some fresh people who don’t have the print reporter mindset may help. But if the paper’s policy against linking externally remains, it will hasten the Times‘ decline, for two reasons:

  1. There will inevitably be additional plagiarism incidents, as print culture tries (and fails) to keep up with the speed of the Web. This will lead to further embarrassment and reduced respect for the Times.
  2. By trying to re-write everything (to avoid linking), the Times will be wasting effort to be later with its reports than it would be if it immediately linked. So people will go elsewhere for timely news.

This post took less than half an hour on the bus. I could have tried to rewrite arguments, but what good would that have done? Excerpting and linking is both the right thing to do and the smart thing to do. It’s wasteful for print media to expend so much energy to avoid giving other people credit.

Hopefully the new social media whiz the Times is hiring will help management understand that.

Facebook 120: Creating a Facebook Group

Groups enable Facebook’s 400 million monthly active users to congregate and interact in discussions related to a subject, even if they aren’t “friends” with all (or even any) of the other members.

Groups in Facebook are different from Pages and even personal Profiles.

  • Profiles are for individuals…for real people. These are the basic user accounts everyone from students to grandparents create. You cannot create a Group unless you have first joined Facebook by creating your personal profile.
  • Pages are for organizations, or brands. In our Mayo Clinic context, we have one Facebook “fan” page.
  • Groups are the means to create connections among people with common interests, and are the way to create communities in Facebook. The rest of this post will take you through the process of creating a Facebook group.

I established the Facebook Group Users Group as a way for people to get guidance on setting up Facebook groups. Please feel free to join it. In a moment, I will take you step-by-step through the process of setting up a group, using the Facebook Group Users Group as an example.

But first, here are some of the key issues you need to decide when setting up your group:

Should it be limited to one of your networks, or open to all of Facebook?

This is a different question than the Open/Closed/Secret one below. If you limit the group to only the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine network, for instance, only people with a Mayo.edu email address will be able to join. Once you decide, you can’t change your mind, so I generally recommend making it open to all of Facebook. You can still limit access by making the group Closed or Secret, but once you’ve chosen to limit to a network you can’t later make it more open.

Should it be Open, Closed or Secret?

  • An Open group is the easiest to administer, because anyone can join it without being invited or getting approval from a group administrator. If you want to build a group quickly and if confidentiality of information shared isn’t a concern, open is the way to go.
  • Anyone can see basic information about a Closed group (and can request to join), but wall posts, discussions and photos are limited to members. Group creators or administrators can invite their Facebook friends to join. If you have some need to limit access to the conversations and group membership, Closed is a good option. As administrator, you will get a Facebook message whenever someone requests to join, which you can approve or deny.
  • A Secret group is the most confidential option, but also the most difficult to form. The only way people can join is by being invited, because the group won’t show up in public listings or on anyone’s individual profile. To invite someone to the group, you need to be their friend in Facebook (or invite them via email through the group.)

One short-term option you can use is to start the group as Open or Closed, and then once everyone has joined you can switch it to Secret.

How to set up your Facebook Group

Note: Click any of the images below to see a larger version.

From your Home page in Facebook, click on the Groups link in the left column navigation:

Then at the top of the page you will see a button that says “Create a Group.” Click it.

This will bring you to the first page of group set-up, for which I have inserted below the screen shot of the settings I used for the Facebook Group Users Group.

A few points:

  • Except in unusual circumstances, you will want to make the group “Global (Available to all of Facebook) under the Network setting. You can still manage who is allowed to be a member of the group via the Closed or Secret settings in the next step, but once you limit to a particular network you are forever barring people outside of that network from joining. If, however, you want a group to only be available to members from your workplace (or school), you could limit to one of your networks. But once you decide that, you can’t change it.
  • Take time to choose your Group Type and sub-type. With each of the Categories, there are different options for sup-type. Here is a listing of the Categories:

  • Choose a meaningful title and add a good description of the group. This will make it more likely that if friends of your group members see the group, they will find it interesting and decide to join.

When you click the “Create Group” button on the bottom of the first page, you will go to a second page that enables you to set options for who is able to post to the group’s Wall, or upload photos and videos. Unless you have a specific reason to be more exclusive, I recommend enabling anyone who is a member of the group to write on the wall and upload photos and video.

The goal is interaction, after all.

On this same page, you will be able to choose whether the group is Open, Closed or Secret (as described above.) Here is what that choice looks like:

When you hit the “Save” button, you will be asked whether you want to publish a notification to the wall of your personal Profile and to your friends’ home pages. It will look like this:

If you want the world to know that you have created this group so others will be encouraged to join, hit the Publish button. If you only expect to invite a limited number of people to join (as in the example of an online focus group or patient support group), hit “Skip.”

In Step 3, you get to invite your friends to join the group.

Just start typing their names (or you also can invite an entire friend list), and when their names show up you can click on their picture to select them. After you have selected all those you would like to invite (and added any message describing the group and why you invited them), you can send the invitations and go back to the front of the Group.

From there, you can upload a picture to represent the group, as you see below.

It’s a pretty straightforward interface; I decided for the Facebook Group Users Group to upload a screen shot of the first step in creating a group. The picture you choose should be meaningful for your group.

That’s really all there is to creating a group in Facebook. In a separate post, I will highlight some of the basic interaction steps within a group, and how you can further customize it to be most useful.